Only the Appearance of Design?

There is perhaps no more famous atheist than Richard Dawkins. The evolutionary biologist has spent many years of his life pushing back against religious ideas. One of his better-known books, however, finds a sort of common ground between Christians and atheists. His book, The Blind Watchmaker (1986), describes how precisely fine-tuned our planet is for life. However, he refers to this as an illusion. It is only the appearance of design, and he spends most of the book explaining why it is only an appearance. Let’s stop there for a moment and consider the implications. The appearance of design begs many questions regarding our universe, planet, and God’s existence.

Common Ground: Precise Fine Tuning

Let’s start with where Christians and atheists can agree. It is pretty incredible that life exists, period. The odds of this happening purely by chance are ridiculously slim. The information coded into our DNA, information required for our lives to be possible, is ridiculously complex. Even the most simple celled organism is more complicated than most of our modern technology.

Zoom out to our planet. From the amount of water and oxygen in our planet’s atmosphere to the distance from the sun, we appear to be perfectly balancing on a knife’s edge. Move a tiny bit in either direction on any of these issues, and our planet could not support life as we know it. They say we are in the “Goldilocks Zone” for a reason.

Zoom even further out and consider the universe itself. Our universe is expanding. However, it is expanding at a particular rate that is essential for life to exist. If it expanded slightly faster or slower, life would be impossible in our universe. This is just one of about 30 fundamental forces in our universe that demonstrate the appearance of design.

What Does That Information Tell Us About Design?

Most of that information is not controversial. Christians and skeptics alike can observe the data and conclude that our existence is incredible. Where we differ is in what conclusion do we draw from this information. Do we take Dawkins’ approach and figure that there are too many complications and flaws with that precision to be considered designed?

Dawkins Has More Ground to Cover

We must be fair to Dawkins. His view is that despite the complexity in biology, natural selection provides an adequate method to obtain that complexity. His point was only about evolutionary biology, not physics, cosmology, geology, etc. In one sense, I do not want to stretch his claims into subjects that he did not intend. However, this also demonstrates that he has a lot more work to do. Say for a moment that he is right, and Dawkins can naturalistically explain all biological complexity. Before he declares God as unnecessary, he still must answer how that first life came into existence and why our planet and universe make that possible.

Explaining a theory of how human eyes could have developed through evolution gets us no closer to understanding how the first evolving cells came into being. Perhaps Dawkins might respond, as he famously said before, “I am against religion because it teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world.” If we can explain the eye now, we will be able to explain how the first cell came about one day. Just give it time, right? Christians do not support intelligent design because we don’t have an explanation. We support design because there is positive evidence for a designer. That appearance of design in all areas of our existence begs too many questions to be ignored.

What Best Explains the Appearance of Design?

Something that always helps me grasp big scientific or philosophical issues like this is to break down what all the options are. Generally speaking, there are only three possible explanations for this appearance of design.

1. Chance: The notion that all of this is here purely by random chance. Yeah, it may be unlikely, but we’re here. Though this is a commonly held view, the more evidence we find, the more indefensible it becomes. The conditions we are in are so unlikely that believing it happened by chance is far more irrational than appealing to God.

2. Physical Necessity: Maybe it’s not purely random, though. Maybe this is how it had to be. Could a larger force like gravity have determined how our universe formed, in a sense rigging the game? Though possible, this view needs evidence to be supported. At the moment, that evidence is sorely lacking.

3. Design: Of course, it is still possible that the appearance of design is not an illusion. Observing problems we see in design today doesn’t disprove God any more than a cracked iPhone disproves Steve Jobs. Skeptics need to contend with how that design came about in the first place. A blind watchmaker is still a watchmaker.

Discuss your thoughts for this post on our Facebook Group here.

One thought on “Only the Appearance of Design?”

Comments are closed.

Catagories
Archives
Calendar
May 2021
S M T W T F S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
RSS Listen to Our Latest Podcast Here
  • Help Me Hate White People Part 1 May 18, 2021
    In this episode of The Tent Making Christianity Podcast, the team discusses a recent devotional book that featured a prayer for God to help the author to "Hate White People".  Part 1 of 2
    Drew Covert, David Johansen, Paul Yearyean
  • Should We Take The Bible Literally? May 13, 2021
    In this episode of The Tent Making Christianity QCQ Podcast, the team discusses whether Christians should take the Bible literally.
    Drew Covert, David Johansen, Paul Yearyean
  • Do People Still Care If Christianity Is True? May 11, 2021
    In this episode of The Tent Making Christianity Podcast, the team discusses whether offering evidence for the truth of Christianity is still relevant in our culture. 
    Drew Covert, David Johansen, Paul Yearyean
  • Why Did God Create Satan? May 6, 2021
    In this episode of The Tent Making Christianity QCQ Podcast, the team answers the question "Why did God create Satan?".
    Drew Covert, David Johansen, Paul Yearyean
  • Holding A Consistent Christian World View In Politics May 4, 2021
    In this episode of The Tent Making Christianity Podcast, the team discusses how to maintain a consistent Christian worldview in politics.  
    Drew Covert, David Johansen, Paul Yearyean
  • Why Did God Create People He Knew Would Go To Hell? April 29, 2021
    In this episode of The Tent Making Christianity QCQ Podcast, the team discusses the question "Why did God create people He knew would go to hell?"
    Drew Covert, David Johansen, Paul Yearyean
  • The Satan Shoes April 27, 2021
    In this episode of The Tent Making Christianity Podcast, the team discusses a recent marketing campaign featuring the Satan shoes. 
    Drew Covert, David Johansen, Paul Yearyean
  • Is There A Contradiction In Paul's Conversion Story? April 22, 2021
    In this episode of The Tent Making Christianity QCQ Podcast, the team discusses whether there is a contradiction in Paul's conversion story. 
    Drew Covert, David Johansen, Paul Yearyean
  • The Easter Tweet April 20, 2021
    In this episode of The Tent Making Christianity Podcast, the team discusses an infamous tweet that appeared on Easter Day. 
    Drew Covert, David Johansen, Paul Yearyean
  • Are There Modern Day Apostles? April 15, 2021
    In this episode of The Tent Making Christianity Podcast, the team answers the question "Are there modern-day apostles?"
    Drew Covert, David Johansen, Paul Yearyean